User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 25

Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 1: 2025

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moddergat (Noardeast-Fryslân), 17-09-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moddergat (Noardeast-Fryslân), 17-09-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl in Graubünden. 12-10-2024. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most beautiful angle, but good quality --Michielverbeek 06:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woningen boven S-charl, 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moddergat (Noardeast-Fryslân), 17-09-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 05:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche S-charl, 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol, Katholische Kirche Scuol . 11-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moddergat (Noardeast-Fryslân), 17-09-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabbegat 14:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 05:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The noise in the middle should be removed. --Ermell 08:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:21, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lots of noise --Poco a poco 10:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 15:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture is good but needs categorization. --Plozessor 05:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Sorry, stupid mistake. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 01:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are quite noisy and the inside is pretty dark. Do you think you can improve that? --Plozessor 05:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise Reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Colour balance is off. --Kallerna 07:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for your comment. Question: Do you find the photo too hot or too cold?--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Almost all your photos are too warm and yellow. --Kallerna 17:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC) I agree that saturation is too ihigh here, imo it is the result of editing a dark photo, forest is a hard place to shoot, but you can try reediting it --Горбунова М.С. 21:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC) *:@Kallerna, XRay, Tournasol7, and Горбунова М.С.: * Done, Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now and before). Thank you for your fixes. --XRay 05:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:01, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen tabakspot 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen tabakspot 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Denis Apel 07:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. -- Denis Apel 07:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a strange halo around the element on the roof peak on the right --Jakubhal 06:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC) *@Jakubhal  Done. Halo’s removed. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:56, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not too sure about b&s, but tend to support --Lvova 12:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dode stam van een berk. 18-04-2025 (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 04:42, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:43, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detail of the white flowers washed out. Reducing highlights/whites may bring out detail? --Tagooty 04:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC) *@Tagooty Done. Correction of the highlights. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 05:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche S-charl, 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol, Katholische Kirche Scuol . 11-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moddergat (Noardeast-Fryslân), 17-09-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabbegat 14:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 05:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The noise in the middle should be removed. --Ermell 08:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:21, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lots of noise --Poco a poco 10:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandefjild, 19-08-2024. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 15:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture is good but needs categorization. --Plozessor 05:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Sorry, stupid mistake. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 01:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are quite noisy and the inside is pretty dark. Do you think you can improve that? --Plozessor 05:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC) * Done. Noise Reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Colour balance is off. --Kallerna 07:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for your comment. Question: Do you find the photo too hot or too cold?--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC) Almost all your photos are too warm and yellow. --Kallerna 17:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC) I agree that saturation is too ihigh here, imo it is the result of editing a dark photo, forest is a hard place to shoot, but you can try reediting it --Горбунова М.С. 21:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC) *:@Kallerna, XRay, Tournasol7, and Горбунова М.С.: * Done, Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now and before). Thank you for your fixes. --XRay 05:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:01, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen tabakspot 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl richting Alp Sesvenna. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen tabakspot 18-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra. 14-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tinnen sierkan. 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum) 18-01-2025. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 11-10-2024. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Denis Apel 07:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. -- Denis Apel 07:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a strange halo around the element on the roof peak on the right --Jakubhal 06:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC) *@Jakubhal  Done. Halo’s removed. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:56, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not too sure about b&s, but tend to support --Lvova 12:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dode stam van een berk. 18-04-2025 (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 04:42, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:43, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detail of the white flowers washed out. Reducing highlights/whites may bring out detail? --Tagooty 04:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC) *@Tagooty Done. Correction of the highlights. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 04-03-2025. (actm.) jpg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Persons arm at the left should be cropped out. --Ermell 06:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC) @Ermell>* Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:41, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State. 26-02-2025. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:32, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, 13-05-2025. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, 13-05-2025. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 08:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, 13-05-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:20, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppingawier. 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). 26-02-2025. (actm.) jpg 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dode stam van een berk. 18-04-2025 (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus Haren (Groningen) 20-04-2025. (actm.) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, 13-05-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolsward, Julianapark. 13-05-2025. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC) #invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted/layout --QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC) Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted